Ever since Donald Trump came down the escalator at Trump Tower on June 16, 2015, it seems like I’ve been swallowing a consistent diet of red pills. The red pill reference, for those who don’t know, comes from the hit 1999 movie The Matrix with Keanu Reeves. As the character Neo, Reeves is given the choice by Morpheus, played by Laurence Fishburne, of two pills, blue or red. If he decides to take the blue pill, he will remain in the surface world that seems like the real world to everyone, but is actually an illusion. If he takes the red pill, he will go down an Alice in Wonderland-like rabbit hole called The Matrix and learn about a simulated reality in which everyone is trapped but doesn’t know it. Things are not what they seem. The list of the things that were not what they seemed to me is long and seems to be growing longer.
One of the more recent is American foreign policy. I’ve always been patriotic, and part of that was supporting the American military, which I still do. I supported all the wars America has fought, and thought they were necessary and good. That’s what I was told by those who surely wouldn’t lie to me. When Trump in the very first debate of the primary said the Iraq war was a terrible mistake, a disaster, I felt uncomfortable, as I think many conservatives did who supported it. We knew Trump was right but hated to admit it. I thought we had to get rid of Saddam, even though we found no weapons of mass destruction. I believed the CIA was mistaken, but surely, they weren’t purposefully lying to get us into war?
After six years of lies coming out of the FBI and CIA, I am no longer so sure about that given what Eisenhower warned about in his famous words, the Military-Industrial Complex. It is apparently a beast that must be fed no matter how much misery, destruction, and death it takes to feed it. Look at the tens of millions of people who died or were maimed and displaced because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And what exactly was accomplished in exchange for all that blood and treasure? Arguably, it made things far worse.
I’ve been familiar with that phrase most of my life, and even knew that it came from the president’s farewell address, but I’d never actually listened to or read it. I knew his words came as a warning about that complex, but never really considered what it might mean, and how seriously we ought to take his warning. Recently, I finally decided to read it for myself. When President Eisenhower gave the televised address on January 17, 1961, I was all of five and a half months old, so I don’t quite remember it. Reading it after all these years made me wonder why I, and so many of those of us who consider ourselves “conservatives,” never really took his warning seriously. We should have. War is a business that makes a lot of people a lot of money and gives a lot of people a lot of power, which is exactly what Eisenhower warned against:
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must ask ourselves since Eisenhower left office, which of the wars have been justified by the only reason for war: self-defense. I am upset that the military-industrial complex has been trying to get us into another war in the Ukraine, especially having sent $40 billion dollars we don’t have to enable it to continue. I wrote our senators with that complaint because both voted for sending the money. One of them replied that he was absolutely convinced supporting Ukraine is in our “national self-interest.” I used to not question that concept, but now I do. What does that even mean on the other side of the world? And who decides what is in our “national self-interest”?
Our first president gave us a similar warning in his farewell address:
Hence likewise they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which under any form of government are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.
It can be argued that we’ve had an overgrown military establishment since Eisenhower, and that the temptation to fight “forever wars” is great, but why as Christians should we care about all this? Because Christianity is a full orbed view of all of reality, or what has come to be known as a worldview. Liberty and republican government bequeathed to us by America’s founders are direct result of our Christian worldview. If there was no Christianity, there would have been no America, no such thing as rights of individuals apart from the state. Our Declaration of Independence states that our rights come from God not government, and our constitution gives us the right to hold our government, and those who govern, accountable. That includes how our money is spent to defend us against enemies, foreign and domestic.
The day of conservatives uncritically accepting what the “military-industrial complex” says is in our self-interest, is over. The point of carrying a very big stick is so we never have to use it against the bullies of the world. Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump both knew that. The former won the Cold War because of it, and the latter defeated international terrorism. As Christians we need to take much more seriously our responsibility as citizens of a self-governing republic. Just voting and complaining is not enough. God in his providence enabled the genius of our founders to give us a republic unlike any the world has ever known. As Franklin said at the constitutional convention, we have been given a republic if we can keep it. I would argue it is worth keeping for the generations to come, and that means it is worth fighting for.
I will have more thoughts in my next post about how we can each do that.
Recent Comments