Notable Quotation

Notable Quotation

Heidelberg Catechism

Question 1: What is our only comfort in life and death?

Answer: That I with body and soul, both in life and death, am not my own, but belong unto my faithful Savior Jesus Christ; who, with His precious blood, has fully satisfied for all my sins, and delivered me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me that without the will of my heavenly Father, not a hair can fall from my head; yea, that all things must be subservient to my salvation, and therefore, by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life, and makes me sincerely willing and ready, henceforth, to live unto Him.

Question 2: How many things are necessary for us to know, that we, enjoying this comfort, may live and die happily?

Answer: Three things: the first, how great my sins and miseries are; the second, how I may be delivered from all my sins and miseries; the third, how I shall express my gratitude to God for such deliverance.

 

Life’s Swift Passage and Our Only True Fulfillment

Life’s Swift Passage and Our Only True Fulfillment

Nothing quite trips me out like time, and the swiftness of its passage. This is of course a common thing among all human beings as we age. If you’re into your 40s you get what I’m saying, and we get it more with every passing year. This strangeness I’m speaking of is impossible to understand in your 20s and 30s. I sure didn’t. We were at a conference when I was in my 30s, and the speaker was talking about a 3–5-year plan. He said, “You young people think 5 years is a long time; it’s not!” I remember thinking, yes, it is! Oh no, it’s not.

We think we understand this swift passage in our younger years, but it’s only theoretical. If you’re in your 20s or 30s and you look at someone in their 60s or 70s, to you they’re “old;” but those people don’t feel old. Being young, you can’t conceive of yourself being that “old,” and think it will take a long time to get there. It won’t! And when you do get to be that “old” you look at yourself in the mirror and wonder, how the hell did this happen! And so quickly. We oldersters can’t conceive of ourselves as “old” any more than when we were young. But there we are. When my grandfather was 92 and on death’s door, I remember him telling me, “Look at me. Inside I feel like I’m 16, but my body sure doesn’t.”

I was reminded of the swiftness when I read these words of David in Psalm 144:3, 4:

O Lord, what is man that you regard him,
or the son of man that you think of him?
Man is like a breath;
his days are like a passing shadow.

A breath is fleeting indeed, and that is our life. David could obviously relate to tripping out on time’s swift passage (and he lived 2500 years ago!) because he wrote similar thoughts in Psalm 103:

15 As for man, his days are like grass;
he flourishes like a flower of the field;
16 for the wind passes over it, and it is gone,
and its place knows it no more.

Grass is a little more enduring than a breath, but not much. This Psalm is so beautiful because David focuses on the blessings of God for His people, and that His steadfast love for them “is from everlasting to everlasting.” David’s almost maniacal focus on the Lord is the answer to time’s swift passage, our hope of life eternal with the God who created life itself. And without sin and misery and death!

I’ve always loved history, almost majored in it in college. I’m currently reading Winston Churchill’s A History of the English-Speaking Peoples: The Birth of Britain, and just finished a chapter on Henry V. This king of England lived from 1386 to 1422, died at only 35, and reading about his life and times almost made him present in mine. Those people living in medieval Europe at the time seemed alive to me. I know they were just like us, but that was 600 years ago! Poof! Over. They couldn’t conceive of 600 years passing from their lives any more than we can.

Unfortunately, it’s so much easier to live by sight than by faith (i.e., trust), so most people obsess with the here and now, the mundane, and treat these things as if they are more important than what comes after this life. This is why the topic of death, our mortality, is not a polite topic of conversation. It’s such a downer and most people would just as soon ignore it even though they know they’re headed on a freight train to the grave. The infinite distractions of modern secular life make that particularly easy, but it’s always been so. Here is Pascal’s take on his contemporaries in the 17th century:

We can’t imagine a condition that is pleasant without fun and noise. We assume that every condition is agreeable to which we can enjoy some sort of distraction. But think what kind of happiness it is that consists merely in being diverted from thinking about ourselves! As though they could wipe out eternity and enjoy some passing happiness merely by repressing their thoughts.

In spite of all these miseries man wants to be happy, and only to be happy, and cannot help wanting to be happy. But how can he go about this? It would be best if he could make himself immortal, but since he cannot do this, he has decided to stop thinking about it. Being unable to cure death, misery, and ignorance, men have decided that in order to be happy, they must repress thinking about such things.

But try as we might, death stalks us at every turn, and as Pascal further says, “The last scene of the play is bloody, however fine the rest of it. They throw dirt over your head, and it is finished forever.” Yet that last scene is something everyone knows is coming, and sooner than we think. Yet most people refuse to even think about it, as if the thinking or talking about it would make it real when it’s not.

Even we as Christians fall into this trap thinking if we just make it over the next hill, we’ll find the elusive thing called happiness, or fulfillment, or some such satisfaction of soul, but as soon as we crest the hill we see there’s another higher hill beyond it to climb. It’s the “grass is always greener” affliction. If only I had . . . 

As my children were growing up, I had a saying that’s a slight variation of Wesley’s statement to Buttercup in The Princess Bride, Life is disappointment, Highness. No matter what you get in life, no matter how much you want it and dream of it and aspire to it, it will never fully satisfy. Never. In fact, after you reach what you thought was the peak, you find it isn’t so great after all.

Our youngest son seemed especially given to this temptation. When he wanted something like a guitar, he really wanted it, had to have it, and I knew he thought if he just got it that would be it, fulfillment. As soon as he opened the box I would mock him, saying something like, “Now your life has meaning! You’ll finally get true fulfillment.” And he would reply, “Oh, shut up!” He got the message. But even when we know this, we’re still easily seduced by it.

Me and my best friend forever, Greg Luther Smith (since 7th grade, which is almost forever!), went to Italy in 2014. I planned every moment for many months, and we talked about it all the time, how great it would be, once in a lifetime, etc. and it was incredible. But afterward we almost felt let down. All the incredible artwork we saw in the Vatican Museum or the Ufizzi, the incredible history of the Roman Forum and Palatine Hill, the beauty of Rome and Florence, all of it was amazing. But afterward we both felt like, that’s it? Not that it wasn’t all that we expected, but it couldn’t live up to the anticipation and expectation. Nothing in life ever does.

Solomon told us why: God has put eternity into the heart of man, and only what is eternal can truly fill it—that would be God himself in Christ. Pascal said it best once again:

What else does this craving, and this helplessness, proclaim but that there was once in man a true happiness, of which all that now remains is the empty print and trace?

This he tries in vain to fill with everything around him, seeking in things that are not there the help he cannot find in those that are, though none can help, since this infinite abyss can be filled only with an infinite and immutable object; in other words by God himself.

God through Isaiah encourages us not to be seduced by the empty promises of this life:

“Come, all you who are thirsty,
come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.
Why spend money on what is not bread,
and your labor on what does not satisfy?
Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good,
and you will delight in the richest of fare.
Give ear and come to me;
listen, that you may live.

Ironically, only in God himself can we truly enjoy what this life offers.

 

The Best Discussion of Postmillennialism I’ve Heard

The Best Discussion of Postmillennialism I’ve Heard

As I’ve written here previously, the very last thing I expected in my red pill journey that started when Donald Trump came down the golden escalator in June of 2015 was to become a postmillennialist (PM). I’d rejected this eschatological position out of hand for many years, although I’d never once studied it. Funny how I could reject something so firmly I knew absolutely nothing about. It was obviously a discredited position, so why bother.

One of the guys mentioned a book by Lorraine Boettner about the topic and I said to myself, I have to get that. Then when I saw the cover it looked familiar, and there it was in my library! I remember getting it back when I was in seminary, which would be about 35 years ago. Had I ever even cracked it open? Nooooooo. Now I have!

As I continue to read and listen and learn, I am more convinced than ever that PM is the biblical eschatology. If you are at all open to this, I would encourage you to listen to this discussion of two other converts to PM, Joel Webbon and Dale Partridge. In this case, Dale is the one sharing his journey to PM, and he was a very reluctant convert. The amount of energy and time he spent in his own studying and learning and listening is impressive, and at least makes him worth listening to.

Briefly, what appeals to me about PM, other than being convinced it is the biblical position, is that it’s all about, in the title of an N.T. Wright book, Jesus and The Victory of God. On the other hand, the premillennial position is all about (as I learned from the guys John MacArthur once said), “Down here we lose, up there we win.” No wonder those who embrace the pre-mill position, and this is the vast majority of Evangelical Christians, are uniformly negative and defeatist. The essence of this view is things will get worse and worse and worse, yea, must get worse and worse and worse, then Jesus will return!

I can no longer look at Psalm 2 and 110, I Cor. 15:25, and Ephesians 1, among many others, and believe that. These are not mere “proof texts” as if they’re the only texts that affirm the doctrine. The entire scope of redemptive history is Jesus and the victory of God. Satan has been defeated on the cross and in the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, fulfilling the prophetic declaration of God in the garden that he would crush the serpent’s head. It now distresses me to think I ever believed the story of the New Testament church and the coming of the kingdom of God (not the same thing) was about the victory of the devil on earth.

It excites me immensely to now have solid theological grounding for my optimism in knowing that Christ is ruling at this very moment in the midst of his enemies until he puts them under his feet. I encourage you to give the video a listen to see if PM might make as much sense to you as it does to us.

Psalm 127: Unless the Lord Builds The house . . . .

Psalm 127: Unless the Lord Builds The house . . . .

When I wrote my first book, The Persuasive Christian Parent, this short Psalm by Solomon was an inspiration, especially the first verse:

Unless the Lord builds the house,
the builders labor in vain.
Unless the Lord watches over the city,
the guards stand watch in vain.

Some people who read the book, or didn’t, accused me of arguing that I could guarantee my children maintaining their faith throughout life. As I said in the book itself, we are in control of nothing and can’t guarantee anything, but what we can and must do is be the best builders we can be. Not to mention God holding us accountable for how we raise our children. It’s not a dice game, a shot in the dark, but as my subtitle says, it is God’s provision for building an enduring faith in us and our children. He has given us everything we need, as Peter says, for life and Godliness through our knowledge of Him.

We see in Solomon’s wisdom a profound biblical truth: God builds and we build. These are not mutually exclusive but complimentary truths. It is my responsibility to build the best house I can possibly build. If I build a crappy house and it collapses in the storm, that is not God’s fault. It is mine! Some Christians are under the impression if they pray big, mountain moving prayers to God, that gets them off the hook for working their tail off. It doesn’t!

A good example is my current occupation. When I started building my business from scratch (on 100% commission), I was told if I make 50 to 60 calls a day, every day, I could not fail. And that is exactly what I did. I also prayed fervently to God because I desperately needed him to bless my efforts and establish the work of my hands. Me and God did some serious wrestling the first couple years because it was scary. It caused me to build my trust muscle in ways I’d never experienced before in my life, and as miserable as it was at times, the blessings have been incredible. In fact, I can hear my wife and granddaughter in the other room now as I type these words, and she is able to watch Eleanor when it’s needed because she doesn’t need to have a job anymore. That is an answer to prayer, all God, even as I worked my ever-living guts out to get it. So it’s both all me and all God—I work as if it depends on me, and pray because it depends on God.

These words of David in I Chronicles 29 were incredibly important in this difficult journey. They were in the church bulletin in the first or second church service we attended when we moved to Florida in June of 2017. I kept the bulletin and decided I was going to commit them to memory. Little did I know how much I would come to depend on them in the next several years:

11 Yours, Lord, is the greatness and the power
and the glory and the majesty and the splendor,
for everything in heaven and earth is yours.
Yours, Lord, is the kingdom;
you are exalted as head over all.
12 Wealth and honor come from you;
you are the ruler of all things.
In your hands are strength and power
to exalt and give strength to all.
13 Now, our God, we give you thanks,
and praise your glorious name.

Wealth and honor come from Him even though we have to earn it, and knowing it is all him and all me makes it all the sweeter in fulfillment. It wasn’t God waving his magic wand, or me alone by the painful toil and the sweat of my brow. It has been real achievement in which I can take justifiable pride while at the same time giving God the glory because in a real way it all comes from him.

One of the practical applications for me is that I pray for things in the past I would just do without prayer in my business and daily life. So if I have a challenging situation I do everything within my power to do what I have to do. Then I commit the situation to the Lord and affirm whatever the results are, are up to him, and I trust him. It is this dynamic that has made Isaiah 26:3 one of my favorite verses:

You will keep in perfect peace him whose minds is steadfast, because he trusts in you.

Perfect peace is something I very much want and trusting in the sovereign Almighty God of the universe is the way to get it. Why is it that Jesus commands us not to worry? Because he wants us to experience perfect peace! Or why does Paul command us not to be anxious about anything? So that we can experience the peace of God “which transcends all understanding.” I want that! When I talk to friends and relatives who are worried and anxious about things I tell them: Repent!!! Worry and anxiety are sin. If we don’t have the peace Isaiah and Paul speak about, we are in sin. We are not trusting God, and we ought not to do that because God is worthy of our trust.

If it were only that simple, right? It actually is, but it takes practice like anything else. Deciding to trust God has to become the automatic reflex of our lives when “life happens.” And it happens all the time. We all know that “thorns and thistles” are a fact of existence, every single day, but every time they create challenges and adversities it’s an opportunity to trust God, or not. It doesn’t take long to realize the God David praises as the one who is “the ruler of all things,” is worthy of our trust in all things.

Does God Exist? A Conversation with Tom Holland, Stephen Meyer, and Douglas Murray

Does God Exist? A Conversation with Tom Holland, Stephen Meyer, and Douglas Murray

If you’ve been around a while you’re no doubt familiar with the “New Atheists” who fleetingly crossed the cultural firmament for a decade early in this century. There was nothing “new” about these “New” atheists because their arguments, such as they were, were as old and stale as moldy bread. They were cliché driven anti-Christian fanatics who gained shooting star fame, and then were gone. It’s amazing to have witnessed how popular they were, then in very short order they weren’t. Non-Christian belief in the form of atheism and agnosticism still exists, obviously, but there is a breed of what we might call the New-New Atheists, and they are very important for the re-establishment of Christian Western civilization.

We’ve been programmed to think because of the onslaught of secularism over the last hundred plus years that secularism is ascendent never to retreat, and Christian civilization in the West is a spent force never to be seen again. For most people this is axiomatic, but I beg to differ. I use the Berlin Wall as a metaphor far too often, but it fits. In the ‘80s almost everyone thought Soviet communism was if not eternal, close to it. Then, like the New Atheists, it was gone. Secularism, alas, will not go so fast, and rebuilding Christian Western civilization will not be so easy, but I am convinced it will happen, as I am arguing in my next book. Our New-New Atheists are a big step in that direction.

In case you’re not familiar Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson, he does interviews of interesting people on interesting topics, and he’s very good at it. Speak  ing of the Berlin Wall, he was a speech writer in the Reagan administration, and it was he who wrote Reagan’s tear down this wall speech, standing firm against all who said he should take that line out. Of the three gentlemen he’s interviewing about God’s existence, Stephen Myer is a Christian philosopher and author, and advocate for Intelligent Design. The other two are a couple of brilliant Brits. Douglas Murray is an author and political commentator, and Tom Holland is a scholar of the ancient world and the author of many books, his latest, Dominion argues that it is Christianity that gave us the modern world, and without it, a pagan world would be a very different and less hospitable place.

One of the things that stood out to me in the conversation was when Murray says, “I just don’t know.” And I think he repeats it several times. It’s a fascinating statement about the state of the man’s psychology. The issue, as it is for all atheists and agnostics, comes down to epistemology. In other words, how is it that we can “know” something. Is knowing even possible? He assumes he knows all kinds of things, but when it comes to God he just can’t “know.” This unnecessary dilemma so many face goes back to 17th century French Catholic philosopher Renes Descartes. He was trying to counter the growing skepticism of the age and attempted to prove that absolute certainty was possible. It is not! In fact, it is a fool’s errand, but his work put epistemology and the search for absolute certainty at the heart of intellectuals’ search for knowledge ever since.

Murray’s error, and Holland obviously suffers from it too, is that they believe they require some kind of knowing related to God that is different than all the other “knowing” of their lives. Any person who thinks clearly about these things (and given sin, that is not as easy as it sounds, Rom. 1:20) has to realize that all our knowledge requires faith, i.e., trust. I could prove this with one zillion examples, literally, but it isn’t necessary. Just think about it. Do we know anything with absolute certainty? Of course not. It isn’t even debatable. Which means faith, i.e., trust, is required for knowledge.

I use a phrase to make this point: there is no such thing as an unbeliever. You’ll notice throughout the conversation that Murray and Holland use faith as if it applies to other people but not them. The fact is every human being lives by faith, whether that is about metaphysical issues, like God’s existence, or should I trust the baby sitter with my child, or the doctor with my health, or the person selling me the car, and again, the examples are endless. Do I really know my wife loves me? I think I do, and there is plenty of evidence given she’s put up with me for 35 years, but I have to trust that she does. Or Do I even really know that I exist? Or do the solipsists have it right, that reality only exists in my brain? How do I know! Can I really be certain? Maybe my totally bizarre dreams I have every night are reality, and the daily mundane world I inhabit is the real dream. 

Knowing isn’t so obvious after all, but atheists and agnostics delude themselves in thinking it is. Thankfully, we don’t have to have absolute certainty to know God exists, and that Jesus of Nazareth lived, died, and rose from the dead that we might have life eternal. Stephen Meyer knows this, and he’s brilliant. He’s far more persuasive than his two agnostic interlocutors.