Genesis 49: Jacob’s Farewell Prophecy to His Sons and Christ’s Kingly Reign

Genesis 49: Jacob’s Farewell Prophecy to His Sons and Christ’s Kingly Reign

The continuity of the Bible is mind blowing. Sixty-six different books written by 40 or so different authors over 1500 years in Hebrew and Greek, with a little Aramaic thrown in, and yet it is one consistent message. The entirety of redemptive history is found in microcosm in the account of the fall in Genesis 3, and God’s curse on the serpent, and His promise to fix it:

15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring and hers;
he will strike your head,
and you will strike his heel.

From there the story plays out in a very crooked line directly toward ultimate victory to Revelation 22 and the total consummation of all things.

This continuity and consistency is a powerful reason I believe the Bible could not have been made up, mere human invention, fiction to one degree or another. Remember, for 300 years, the Bible’s critics have asserted not only could it be made up, but in fact was and could easily be so, and Christians have been on the defensive ever since. Both they and we act as if we’re the only ones who have the burden of proof. Not true. Since they think it would be a piece of cake to make it all up, let them provide evidence it was. Reading or listening to such critics, we’ll quickly realize all they have are assertions based on question-begging anti-supernatural bias, conclusions assumed with questionable justification. The mental gymnastics and pretzel logic they have used over the years is truly impressive. And that people bought it uncritically, pun intended, is quite the feat. For many reasons, secular critical scholars don’t have the credibility they once did, and they never again will, but the bias and assertions remain.

Recently reading Genesis 49 I was reminded of this continuity and consistency. Jacob is about to die and tells his sons what is to come. In verse 1 he says, “Gather around so I can tell you what will happen to you in days to come.” Most English translations say, “days to come,” but the Hebrew literally says last days, the after-part or end. The phrase last days is a common one to Christians. We see it in a variety of verses in the Old and New Testaments, always referring to the Messianic period after Christ. He speaks to all 12, and here is what Jacob says to Judah:

“Judah, your brothers will praise you;
your hand will be on the neck of your enemies;
your father’s sons will bow down to you.
You are a lion’s cub, Judah;
you return from the prey, my son.
Like a lion he crouches and lies down,
like a lioness—who dares to rouse him?
10 The scepter will not depart from Judah,
nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet,
until he to whom it belongs shall come
and the obedience of the nations shall be his.
11 He will tether his donkey to a vine,
his colt to the choicest branch;
he will wash his garments in wine,
his robes in the blood of grapes.
12 His eyes will be darker than wine,
his teeth whiter than milk.

The picture is one of complete dominance and flourishing of the descendent of Judah.

Remember, what we’re reading here is something that took place 400 years before the Exodus, and it will be a very long time before any descendent of Jacob’s will be anything other than slaves. It will be probably another 700 or 800 years before the nation of Israel will even have a land of its own, let alone any power over other nations. As I often say, God is never in a hurry. But think about how crazy this must have sounded. For hundreds of years Hebrew slaves were told this first official biblical prophecy coming through a man and nothing ever changed. God’s word often sounded crazy to God’s people, and often still does, but His track record is pretty good, so we are compelled to trust Him. Why we can trust Him is specifically because of this dominance and flourishing Jacob predicts, as we’ll explore below.

The Lion of the Tribe of Judah
First, though, I want to look more carefully at the metaphor of Jesus as a lion. As a messianic declaration it is specifically speaking to his divinity. In Isaiah 31:4, the lion metaphor speaks of Yahweh as the warrior for His people:

This is what the Lord says to me: “As a lion growls, a great lion over its prey— and though a whole band of shepherds is called together against it, it is not frightened by their shouts or disturbed by their clamor— so the Lord Almighty will come down to do battle on Mount Zion and on its heights.

In Jeremiah 50, Yahweh is like a lion doing battle for Israel against Babylon, and there are four different references to Yahweh as a lion doing battle for His people in Hosea. There are several other such references in other prophets as well, so in New Testament hindsight, we can conclude the lion Jacob refers to is Yahweh is Jesus the Messiah. The most well-known of phrases related to Jesus as lion comes from Revelation 5 where Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the Tribe of Judah. The context is significantly related to Jacob’s prophecy about this descendent of Judah.

He who sits on the throne is holding in his right hand “a scroll with writing on both sides and sealed with seven seals.” John weeps because no one is found worthy to open it, but an elder tells him this Lion of the Tribe of Judah is worthy. In a counter intuitive move, the Lion becomes like a Lamb who was slain, and he takes the scroll, and all of heaven breaks into joyous worship, singing a “new song”:

“You are worthy to take the scroll
and to open its seals,
because you were slain,
and with your blood you purchased people for God
from every tribe and language and people and nation.
10 You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God,
and they will reign on the earth.”

We will see how this relates to Jacob’s prophecy of over 1500 years before, but this lion as slain lamb’s victory is attained through his slaughter, the shedding of his blood to literally buy the people he will turn into a kingdom and servants of God. And not only is this connected to Jacob’s prophecy, but it goes directly back the Genesis 3 and God’s promise that the woman’s seed would strike the serpent’s head, but he only the heel of the seed. But victory in this cosmic spiritual war came in a way nobody could predict until it happened. The very absurdity of it makes it profoundly compelling as the truth.

At the very moment when the forces of darkness were convinced they had defeated Almighty God, He mocks them. Peter tells us in Acts 4 that Psalm 2 is a picture of the crucifixion and resurrection:

The One enthroned in heaven laughs;
the Lord scoffs at them.
He rebukes them in his anger
and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
“I have installed my king
on Zion, my holy mountain.”

I will proclaim the Lord’s decree:

He said to me, “You are my son;
today I have become your father.
Ask me,
and I will make the nations your inheritance,
the ends of the earth your possession.
You will break them with a rod of iron;
you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”

The resurrection was when the lion of the tribe of Judah started his reign on earth. God had defeated his foe, and Satan was now bound and cast down no longer with any ultimate power to deceive the nations. He would now be slowly defeated as God’s kingdom had come and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven. After 2000 years Jacob’s prophecy was finally fulfilled, and he to whom the scepter belongs had arrived.

Jacob’s Prophecy: For Now or Only for the Life to Come?
At this point, how we view “end times,” or our eschatology, will determine how we interpret Jacob’s prophecy. Unlike for much of Christian history, today most Christians believe the obedience of the nations and Jesus receiving the nations as his inheritance will only happen when he returns, at his Second Coming or Advent. The Great Commission in this understanding is primarily witnessing and seeing the gospel preached. The results of that preaching are not the primary point, though fervently wished for. Most Christians, unfortunately, have not thought through their eschatology in any depth, but if you ask them they will likely say any fundamental transformation of this world will only happen when Jesus returns. Prior to that things would inevitably get worse until Jesus finally comes back to clean up the mess once and for all. This is exactly what I believed until about a year and eight months ago when I embraced postmillennialism.

I hadn’t thought through this in any depth either, but I guess I saw the Great Commission as there being Christian conversions in every nation, and once that happened maybe that means the nations had been discipled. In this view, the making of disciples, baptizing them, and teaching them to obey everything Jesus commanded them is severely constricted to individuals. The effects on the culture and society are byproducts of what happens in the church and in the individual lives as Christians. We are the best Christians we can be and some way this leaks out to the rest of the society, and a Christian nation or Christian culture is the result. As a Christian culture warrior I didn’t even believe this, but I hadn’t thought through it enough to have any firm convictions.

This perspective on the Christian life is the fruit of Pietism. I wrote about this previously, so I will not address it here, but the end result is that we see our faith as primarily personal. Another way to put it is that Jacob’s prophecy has nothing to do with life in this fallen world. It’s as if redemptive history after Christ ascended to heaven and the right hand of God only applied to individuals, and maybe church communities, but the rest of humanity is out of luck. I don’t see it that way anymore, and I’ll give a very brief glimpse here of why.

Now, I read passages like this in Genesis 49, and I’m off to the races! I see connections everywhere, and I could keep writing for a long time, but I’ll control myself. I no longer see Jacob’s prophecy as of passing interest because I believe it refers only to Christ coming to set all things right at the end of time. In other words, I don’t believe its relevance is primarily if not solely eschatological. Prior on a practical level, I saw Jesus as only king in the hearts of his people. He was obviously not king of this fallen world; isn’t that obvious? How could he be king if everyone isn’t obeying him and acknowledging him as king? Those are very good questions, but can’t be answered in any depth in a blog post. But I will answer them as best I can in the space I have remaining based on the passages above form Genesis 49, Revelation 5, and Psalm 2 via Acts 4.

The Obedience of the Nations Shall Be His Through His Body
The reality and idea of nations and God dealing with them as nations is common throughout Scripture. As post-Enlightenment secular Westerners (most Christians are secular, the opposite side of the coin of Pietism) we see the world through a personal and individual lens. Everything that happens is interpreted for how it affects individuals, not families, communities, groups, or nations, but God never deals with individuals apart from the larger context in which they live.

Think about your reading through the Old Testament. Early on God dealt with people groups like those spoken of in Genesis 15:19-21: “the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites . . . .” As time went on nations became more well defined by geographical boundaries, like the Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, and Babylonians, but nothing like the modern Westphalian nation-state with permanent boarders. For example, when God called Jonah to go preach his word of judgment to “the great city of Nineveh,” that city eventually repented and turned from their evil ways, God relented and didn’t bring his judgment on the city. The judgment or blessing was to fall on the entire nation. The purpose of God’s covenant to the Patriarchs is to bless the nations, not individuals.

This is clear from Jacob’s prophecy, and it’s direct connection via Acts 4 to Psalm 2. At the moment of the resurrection, Jesus was installed on God’s holy mountain, and the nations at that moment became his inheritance and possession. He did not have to wait until he returned at the end of time. When he ascended to the right hand of God to take all authority in heaven and on earth and sent his Holy Spirit at Pentecost, that actual slow, step-by-step process of taking possession of his nations to bless them per God’s covenant promises began. Too many Christians don’t seem to understand that God is never in a hurry. We’re 4,000 years into this thing, and we think it has to be close to over. What if it’s not? What if we’re not even half way through God extending Christ’s reign on earth and building his kingdom through expanding his church, His people?

We’re in this for the long haul, brothers and sisters. We need to stop this obsession among conservative Christians of whining about it being so bad Jesus must be coming back any day, and get to work building the kingdom. We’re his body, his hands and arms and legs, and this is how it is done, through us. When we read in Revelation that Christ purchased us “to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God” and that we “will reign on the earth,” we need to start acting like it. Doing nothing and cowering in fear as if the works of the devil and the power of sin is greater than our God and Christ and his righteousness, is dishonoring to Almighty God who so loved the world He gave himself up for it.

Moralism and the Horrible Freeing Ubiquitousness of Sin

Moralism and the Horrible Freeing Ubiquitousness of Sin

Sin is all pervasive, ubiquitous. Like oxygen, in a fallen world it is everywhere.

In my first 5 plus years as a Christian I tried very hard to be more moral, to do what is right and be obedient to God, but I wasn’t very good at it. Thus, guilt was a constant companion. Then in February 1984 I was exposed to Reformed theology, soteriology to be exact, and realized my self-focus was a kind of morbid introspection. Christianity for me had been a matter of will, and if I could just determine strongly enough that I would overcome sin, by golly, I would overcome it! I knew I was a sinner and that perfection was not possible, but I guess I felt like it should be. I knew very well of forgiveness, the cross, and Christ as my Savior, so I had what the famous hymn calls blessed assurance. Nonetheless, there was always this nagging thing called sin that dogged my every step.

When I was introduced to Calvinism the best way I can explain it is that it was upside and down and inside out from how I had been looking at Christianity and my Christian life. Simplistically put, my focus shifted from me to God. My journey since, over 40 years, has taught me a lot about myself and sin, and specifically that sin is my constant companion. As my title implies, there is something terribly freeing about that. I came to call what I had been doing previously the fatal externalizing of sin, as if sin was merely what I do and not who I am. Or more accurately according to the Apostle Paul, sin inheres in my flesh, in Greek, sarx-σάρξ, and thus it is inescapable.

One conclusion I came to fairly early on is that if we see sin merely as something we do, and that it is primarily a matter of our will, then what we’re in effect doing is trivializing sin. Viewed this way, sin isn’t a mystery, terrible and profound beyond our comprehension, but something with enough effort we can control. That’s why I came to call it a fatal externalizing of sin because when it becomes an issue of our will, we are trivializing both sin and God’s salvation of us in Christ. The more profoundly deep and disturbing and powerful sin is, the more profound is the salvation from it. We can’t defeat sin by our will power, ever, as Paul makes abundantly clear in Romans 7. The struggle makes us a complete conundrum to ourselves, as Paul says, I don’t understand what I do. What I want to do I don’t do, and what I don’t want to do I do. He comes to the end in complete turmoil declaring himself a wretched man and asks, “Who will deliver me from this body of death?” And he replies, “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” He alone is our hope. But what exactly does that mean for how we live our Christian lives?

Before I get to that, I started thinking about all this when I came across this passage on sin from Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion. He’s basically making a point about the profound nature of sin:

If we search the remotest past, I say that none of the saints, clad in the body of death (cf. Rom. 7:24), has attained to that goal of love so as to love God “with all his heart, all his mind, all his soul, and all his might” [Mark 10:30 and parallels]. I say furthermore, there was no one who was not plagued with concupiscence. Who will contradict this? Indeed, I see what sort of saints we imagine in our foolish superstition; the heavenly angels can scarcely compare with them in purity! But this goes against both Scripture and the evidence of experience. (VII, 5)

Calvin delineates three uses of the law and is speaking here of the law as a mirror that makes us painfully aware of our own sin compared to the holy law of God. The word concupiscence is not used anymore, but it means ardent desire, often sexual, but it’s much broader than that. What Calvin has in mind is the Tenth Commandment:

You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

The Tenth Commandment reveals to us that sin is a matter of desire as much as a matter of action. We can possibly get away with coveting without our neighbor knowing, but God knows, and in due course it will destroy us. No sin stays hidden or internal for long, which is why God warns us against it.

Daily Repentance
It wasn’t too many years ago that I realized the significance of Martin Luther starting his 95 Thesis with the foundational nature of repentance to the Christian life:

(1) When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, “Repent” [Matthew 4:17], he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.

How could the Christian’s entire life be one of repentance unless their entire life was one of sin? Repentance is only necessary where there is sin. Most Christians, however, don’t appear to be rank sinners, anymore than they appear as disheveled and dirty bums. I’ve remarked to my wife many times over the years how incredibly kind and decent Christians are who I’ve come across at churches over 45 years, yet to our secular Christ hating elites Christians are hypocritical, narrow minded, homophobic, self-righteous bigots. I’ve never really met any of those, but I suppose one day I might.

Before I get to this ever present dynamic in the Christian life, I want to share the next two of Luther’s 95 thesis that clarify his meaning:

(2) This word cannot be understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, that is confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.
(3) Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance; such inner repentance is worthless unless it produces various outward mortifications of the flesh.

First, Luther was just beginning to question the Catholic Church, of which he was a priest in good standing, so he needed to differentiate repentance from penance. He still believed in the latter at this point, but it was important not to confuse the two. Repentance doesn’t require a priest or someone else’s forgiveness because it is a requirement of right relationship to God in Christ. We might even say that the forgiveness in Christ is conditional. I know that will give some Christians pause, but it is simply biblical. One example is a verse all Christians should have memorized, 1 John 1:9:

If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.

If we do not confess our sins to God, that is agree with Him that whatever it is we have done or think or feel, is sin, then He will not forgive and purify us. It means forgiveness is conditional.

Second, Luther is saying in thesis 3 that “inner repentance” by itself is worthless if it is not accompanied by outer holiness and obedience to God’s law, i.e., “mortifications of the flesh.” Faith without works is dead is Christianity 101 (James 2). In Romans 6 Paul expresses his horror at the notion some were pushing that grace gives us license to sin. Christianity if it is real, and real in our lives, must make a stark difference in how we live, even if for some people it doesn’t appear much different on the outside, in their moral lives. Even the nicest little old ladies and the respectful young men that help them across the street are rank sinners deserving of hell, or sin isn’t sin. For those of us who don’t have the problem of appearing better than we are, there is hope for real change, which I will address below.

In my own Christian walk as I learned all this, and not too many years ago, I began to practice daily repentance every morning. It was probably around the time, 2012, when I made a commitment that every morning I would read the Bible and get on my knees and pray, one that I have kept ever since. I hadn’t come across Luther’s take on repentance yet, but part of my daily routine was a passage of Scripture I learned as a teenage Catholic in Mass one Sunday, Luke 18. Even at 16 or 17 years old I knew I had a lot more in common with the tax collector than the Pharisee. Like him I could beat my breast and ask, “God have mercy on me a sinner.” I remember the thought popping into my mind: “I can do that!” Given I knew I was a sinner and proficient at it, going away justified was appealing to me.

Christ is Our Righteousness and Sanctification
Which brings me to Christ as our righteousness. Sometime after I started daily repentance, I heard someone say something I’d known pretty much all my Christian life, but which struck me with a force I hadn’t felt before: The wrath of God was fully satisfied in Christ. This meant God could no longer be angry with me. The word propitiation is used four times in the epistles, Romans, Hebrews, and twice in I John. Here is one of the latter:

In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.

The Greek word is defined as:

(a) a sin offering, by which the wrath of the deity shall be appeased; a means of propitiation, (b) the covering of the ark, which was sprinkled with the atoning blood on the Day of Atonement.

Some translations use atonement instead, but that word doesn’t convey the concept of wrath or magnified anger. Sin is so horrific in its destructive effects on God’s creation, especially his greatest creation, man, that anger is the only appropriate response.

A critical point must be made in this regard. We live in a moral world of right and wrong, good and evil, justice and injustice. Every human being knows wrongs must be punished for justice to reign, and if they are not that is terribly morally wrong. In a court of law, if judges decide not a punish a law breaker because they just don’t feel like it, everyone knows that judge must be terminated or society will fall apart and chaos will reign. We don’t have to be taught that justice is required for peace, which requires punishment that brings atonement, reconciliation, or restitution, paying back for the wrong committed. How much more is this dynamic required for a holy infinite God and his rebellious creatures! If God simply forgives man without punishment, there is no justice and God would be like the judge who deserves to be fired. The entire earth would be filled with chaos because people would have no incentive to change; God will forgive me, no big deal. But the wages of sin is death because all sin does is bring death and destruction, its horrible wages.

To get a better grasp on just how serious God takes all this sin business, take some time to read again (and if you haven’t read it yet, you need to read it, now!), Isiah 53. This was written 700 years before the passion of Christ, and it is brutal. Only God himself in the person of his son could pay the infinite price He required, and in order for God’s justice to be met and his wrath satisfied, appeased, it had to be done exactly this way.

Transformation is God’s Job
Which brings us to I Corinthians 1:30. I was aware of this verse much of my Christian life, but at some point post 2012, it struck me with a force I’d never encountered before:

And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption.

The standard which God requires for right relationship to Him, perfect righteousness, or always doing right as Calvin describes love, is Jesus. We trust that he is that impossible standard for us, no more guilt, shame, or needing to measure up to a standard we can never match anyway. And that’s only the beginning. Christ is also our sanctification, or the process of progressively becoming more like God Himself in Christ.

This was really the mind blower for me because as born-again, Protestant Christians, justification, how we’re made right with God, is the doorway into the Christian life. Once we talk through that, we’re in. The challenge though, is as soon as we hit the foyer, Romans 7 slaps us upside the head. Or at least it should, if we understand that sin is more than merely outward conformity to the law. I will say it as clearly as I can: We cannot overcome sin. That brothers and sisters is impossible. But you know who can? In Paul’s response to this dilemma: “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” It is he who can rescue us from this body of death, both now in this life, and in the forever resurrected life to come.

This reminds me a something I read in Charles Hodge’s Systematic Theology very early in my Reformed journey: Christianity is the work of God in the soul of man. Which means it is a supernatural work, a work beyond the natural, beyond what we ourselves can do. In a lightbulb moment talking to a family member some years ago I said our transformation is God’s business. I can’t change myself, not possible. If I think I can, I’m in for frustration and disappointment. Because Jesus is my sanctification, however, I am promised a real change in my being only the Holy Spirit living in, with, and through me can accomplish. All the pressure is off, and daily repentance reminds me that it is “not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit says the Lord Almighty.” (Zech. 4:6)

Lastly, the deeper and more profound the nature of sin, the deeper and more profound is the forgiveness, mercy, and grace of God I experience in the love He has poured into my heart by the Holy Spirit (Rom. 5:5). I am totally unworthy, yet receive the lavish riches of his grace. Knowing this experientially in my life, not only am I compelled to love others, but God is making me able to love others, helping me to want to love others, especially those I don’t want to love. This is how we change the world.

 

Why We Need More Hypocritical Christians

Why We Need More Hypocritical Christians

Since I recently wrote on Christian Nationalism, I need to address a criticism some Christians have of the concept: hypocritical Christians.

This criticism comes mostly from thoughtful Baptists who are consistent with their theological presuppositions and worry that in a Christian nation many or most people who profess Christianity won’t really be born-again, regenerate Christians. That is undoubtably true, and that concern is what I will address in this post. I will argue that is irrelevant to the concept of a Christian nation, and in fact a good thing, thus the title of this post.

We have no way of knowing who the true Christians among the populations of Christian nations of the past were, nor do we know that today. I make it a habit not to presume upon the state of someone’s soul or relationship to the Living God, unless they make it absolutely clear what state that is. I trust those who claim the name of Jesus that they are sincere, even if I disagree with their theology, or even if their life doesn’t reflect it to the degree I think it should. I leave the souls of the non-Christians up to God to deal with as he sees fit. As Hebrews says, “Just as man is appointed to die once, and after that to face judgment,” (Heb. 9:27), so I leave the judging to God.

When I started thinking about writing Going Back to Find the Way Forward in early 2022, I struggled with what as conservative and Evangelical Christians we’re trying to accomplish. What exactly is a Christian society or nation? What does such a thing look like? Is it fifty-one percent of the people being professing Christians? I was always frustrated because I knew intuitively what makes a nation Christian isn’t just the number of Christians. I’m not sure there’s ever been a time in Western history where the vast majority of people in the nations of Christendom were Christians, yet the people, Christian or not, considered themselves living in Christian nations. Most Christians seem to believe if we just convert enough people things will magically change for the better. It doesn’t work that way. What I’ve learned in the last two plus years is the way I think it does work, and more on that to follow.

The Confusion of the Church and the Kingdom
One of the reasons Christians are confused about this, as I was for most of my Christian life, is that I conflated the church and the kingdom of God. To me the church was the kingdom and the kingdom was the church. Anything or anyone outside of the church was not part of God’s kingdom, and it was only where the church or Christians were that made a place God’s kingdom. This is certainly a reflection of Baptist theology which is pretty much ubiquitous in modern Evangelicalism. I didn’t realize as a Presbyterian I had categories to see such a perspective as distorted and unbiblical. Of course Baptists will disagree with me on that.

What’s the difference between the two theological perspectives that merges kingdom and church or doesn’t? For me it was embracing postmillennialism that caused me to realize why as a Presbyterian I should see the church and the kingdom as two distinct and separate, though interrelated entities. The church is the main driver of advancing the kingdom of God in the world, and the kingdom lived out in the life of the church is brought outside of the walls of the church by faithful Christians applying God’s law and word and the gospel to every square inch of life. In the words of Jesus, we are salt and light in a fallen world, and Jesus used such metaphors because what we do in the world matters, as salt we really do enhance flavor and preserve, and as light we really do make darkness flee. In other words, as disciples of King Jesus, what we do actually changes things, pushes back the effects of the fall, and advances God’s kingdom.

First let’s address Baptist theology. For most of the history of the church until the Reformation, all Christians were baptized as infants because Christians were part of the national community of Christians. In Christendom 1.0, as Doug Wilson calls it, church and state were conflated, so in effect the church was the state and the state was the church. Baptism was what introduced you as a community member and citizen. If you were not baptized you were not part of the Church or the community, and thus not part of the nation, not a citizen. This all changed with what’s come to be known as the Radical Reformation, and the introduction into Christendom of the Anabaptists. This was very early in the Reformation, and Anabaptists refused to baptize babies, an extremely unpopular sentiment in those days, and many paid for it with their lives. The reason it was perceived as so dangerous and capital punishment was seen as a reasonable response, was because it threatened the essential order of a society. Religion wasn’t a personal and individual thing in the Middle Ages, but a family and community and societal thing, something that encompassed every area of life.

As you can imagine in such societies, there were a lot of hypocritical Christians, or what I’ve heard some call them, nominal Christians, or Christian in name only. That is undoubtably true, and yet all these people considered themselves living in a Christian nation and culture. This also highlights the concept of the visible and invisible church coming out of the Reformation. Not every baptized member of a church is in fact a born-again Christian, as Jesus says, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” (Matt. 7:21) This applies to Baptists who don’t baptize infants, and Presbyterians who do, but also for that matter Catholics, Orthodox, and Lutherans. Just because someone is baptized and belongs to a church, doesn’t mean their profession of faith is real. God will determine that at the end of time.

Hypocrisy is a Fact of Life: The Only Question is Which Hypocrisy
Do you ever wonder how many woke hypocrites there are? That may sound like an odd question, but think about it. Contrary to the First Amendment, the established religion of America is secularism, and woke, a form of cultural Marxism we’re all too familiar with now, is the most powerful denomination. Few people, though, are secular progressive absolutist woke leftists, yet the woke have no problem imposing their views and policies on an unwilling society. As Christopher Caldwell documents in The Age of Entitlement, because of the Civil Rights Act and other laws passed during 60s, the leftist agenda has been pushed on an unwilling populace from the top down. All the so called “rights” regarding race and sexual perversion were never embraced or welcomed by the vast majority of Americans, until the courts shoved it all down their throats. The examples are legion, and I encourage every American who wants to get our country back to read that book, what I now consider probably the most important book of the 21st century.

Let’s establish one indisputable fact: every human being is a hypocrite. We are all sinners and thus imperfect. That means we can’t live up to our own standards, let alone those of a holy God. We say and believe things, and often act contrary to what we believe. This is just as true for secular people who claim not to be religious, although they too live by faith. They have certain values and beliefs and can’t live up to those all the time either. Just ask one if they are perfect, and they will instantly say no, which means they are hypocrites too.

The greatest illusion in the age of secularism is the myth of neutrality. Because all people live by faith and are thus religious, and because societies are made up of religious people, all of a society’s laws and values are a reflection of their religious faith. Culture is simply religion externalized. There is no morally or religiously neutral nation. The question must always be asked about a nation’s laws: by what standard? Where do a nation’s laws and standards, what is embraced and what is stigmatized, considered right and wrong, come from? Ultimately, there are only two choices, God or man, revelation or reason.

Many scholars and historians seem to miss a very basic fact about America’s founding, that America was founded as a Christian nations. When Jefferson wrote in the Declaration about a Creator, about nature and nature’s God, he and every person who read it knew this Creator and God was the God of the Bible, of Genesis to Revelation. There was not one secularist among the founding generation, and none were doctrinaire Deists. All of America’s founders were Englishmen until they became Americans, and they were fighting for the rights of Englishmen that came down to them from King Alfred the Great in the 9th century, to Magna Carter in 1215, and through the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Every one of those 900 years was bathed in Christianity with God’s law as the foundation of the development of English common law and the rights afforded to citizens because of it.

America was founded as a Protestant Christian nation, and it will only be re-founded to the degree that Christianity again becomes the dominant religious foundation of the nation. As Doug Wilson says, it is either Christ or chaos. Too many conservatives and Christians buy into the myth of neutrality, and that secular pluralism in some kind of classical liberalism is the answer to the current chaos of Marxist wokeness. If you start talking about God’s law, the Bible and Christianity, and God forbid, Christian nationalism, they all start warning everyone against the horror of theocracy, as if the meaning of that word is self-evident. It is not. But yes, God must rule our nation because only if He does, will we regain the liberty our founders fought and died for. Otherwise with secularism, we have tyranny and the will to power, the bitter taste of what America is experiencing now.

Culture, Plausibility Structures, Law, and Faith, and the Disaster of Pietism
A movement in Germany in the 16h century arose to purify the German Lutheran church which came to be called Pietism. In due course it leaked out and infected all forms of Protestant Christianity, especially through the efforts and ministry of John Wesley. The Second Great Awakening in the 19th century was primarily a Pietistic awakening, which in due course turned conservative Bible believing Christianity primarily into a form of fundamentalism. When I was a young Christian in the late 70s and 80s, I learned about Evangelical Christians who I differentiated from the fundamentalists. The former were more culturally engaged and intellectually oriented, while the latter were not. I considered myself an Evangelical because of the influence of Francis Schaeffer very early in my faith journey. Today, however, there is no distinction and few if any embrace what has become post-9/11 a pejorative term, fundamentalism. All conservative protestants are now Evangelicals.

Why do I say that Pietism is a disaster? Because it turned Christian faith inward, making it primarily personal and not societal. Wesley and Pietistic Christians until the raise of fundamentalism very much believed their faith should affect the morals of society, but that was the problem—it was moralistic. Christianity for them was primarily about ethics, right and wrong, doing good verses doing bad, rather than metaphysics, or Christian worldview. Here is a good definition of this term:

The branch of philosophy which studies fundamental principles intended to describe or explain all that is, and which are not themselves explained by anything more fundamental; the study of first principles.

For 1500 years until the rise of Pietism, all Christians saw their faith as totalizing, as an encompassing authority and standard of every area of life, both personal and societal. Pietism was a monumental change in perspective that slowly but completely took over Protestant Christianity, making it increasingly irrelevant to anything more than the Christian’s personal faith journey. The advocates of the Enlightenment, the other side of the Pietistic coin, were all too happy to see Christianity retreat from societal influence, and in due course Christian Western civilization ceased to exist. Now we have woke Western civilization.

This means the culture, plausibility structures, and the law, are all dominated and driven by the secular religion of the Marxist woke faith. On a practical level we live in societies where the social conditions of are no longer conducive to belief in God and Christianity, but in the secular alternatives. Aaron Ren calls this negative world. Up until the 1980s Christianity was seen as a positive good for society. Then as secularism came to dominant the culture, Christianity became something neutral, neither good nor bad, but as the 21st century turned into its second decade, we now live in negative world where Christianity is seen by cultural elites as positively dangerous and regressive. Witness the secular pagan left going nuts over Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker affirming motherhood and the traditional conception of the family. If some famous football player had said the same things in 1995 when he was born, in neutral world, nobody would have noticed.

The mission for Christians and the church in the 21st century, then, is to re-Christianize the culture and build the plausibility structures that makes Christianity plausible to more people, which leads to the growth of the church (more people saved) and the advance of God’s kingdom. We want the social conditions to be conducive to belief in God and Christianity, and that means we reject Pietism and a merely personal faith. On a practical level, per Jesus’ instructions in the Great Commission, our job is to disciple our nation, and teach it and all the people in it, everything Jesus commanded us. In due course as the culture shifts in our direction, that will mean more hypocritical or nominal Christians, which is exactly what we should want. The alternative is the hypocritical woke Marxists we live with now. As Jesus said about the poor, the hypocrites we will always have among us. The question is which kind of hypocrites do we prefer.

 

Recognizing the Spirit of God-Christology

Recognizing the Spirit of God-Christology

For the first more than five years of my Christian life, theology was non-existent. There seemed to be this sense that theology was a distraction at best, and a waste of time at worst. If not overtly taught, I still picked up that theology would get in the way of the most important thing in the Christian life, my personal relationship with Jesus. That was mediated through the Bible alone, not books about the Bible. The Holy Spirit would enlighten me to the truth as I read, and that was all the theology I needed. In this version of Christianity, we read books about this relationship with Jesus, and how to live the holy life, but systematic study of doctrine was non-existent. Then I was introduced to Reformed theology at the ripe old age of 24, and it was as if I’d gone from street level up to the hundredth floor and could now see the panorama of the entire city.

One of the first things I learned is a word I’d never heard before, hermeneutics, or the general principles of interpreting a text. It came from Aristotle and can apply to any text, but given the importance of the Bible to the history of the world, it’s been associated almost exclusively with biblical interpretation. To say my Bible-and-me focus invited interpretive problems would be an understatement; it was a recipe for misinterpretation. Christians will obviously never agree on every interpretation, but once we agree the Bible is the authoritative, inspired infallible word of the Living God, the disagreements are relatively minor.

As we come to the text of Scripture, we need to keep these four things in mind if we are to interpret it rightly:

  1. Authorial intent: what we can assess the author intended when he wrote the words.
  2. Audience understanding: what the intended audience would have been expected to believe the words meant. This means context counts, specifically the moment in history in which it was written.
  3. Scripture interprets Scripture: never read a text in isolation from the rest of Scripture.
  4. Scripture is all about Christ (Luke 24): the overarching theme of God’s revelation to us is Jesus.

To fully benefit from the scope of redemptive history revealed to us in Scripture, we must understand how the puzzle pieces fit into the overall big picture. The pieces can only give us a limited picture, and an easily distorted one. Fortunately, we’re not in this alone, which is why we must read more than just the Bible. We have easy access to books, and the Internet, to help us grow in our understanding of the big picture, and all the little pictures that make it up. If we are to obey the imperative of Scripture itself to grow in our knowledge, then we will want to take advantage of the great minds who have come before us, as well as those of our contemporaries. The treasures are endless.

Christology: The Study of Jesus
The life of Jesus is one such puzzle, and people have been taking pieces of Jesus and distorting the picture for 2,000 years. It is important to understand that first century Jews had no categories for a Messiah like Jesus. Jews had been waiting for a Messiah for 400 years, and nobody expected who the Messiah turned out to be. For all of them, family, friends, and foes, Jesus was a conundrum. For 1,500 years Jews had proclaimed the Shema from Deuteronomy 6:4:

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.

Now here comes Jesus of Nazareth taking prerogatives belonging only to God, like forgiving sin and commanding nature. No wonder they were confused. His resurrection helped them make some sense of who Jesus was, but it took the church 300 years before there was a consensus that Jesus was who all Christians now believe he is, the God-man.

There were a variety of Christological heresies, but all erred in one of two directions. They either emphasized Jesus’ Humanity at the expense of his divinity, or his divinity at the expense of his humanity. The most substantial and dangerous of these heresies was Arianism, a form of Unitarian theology that asserts Jesus is not divine, but a created being. In the early 4th century it seemed like the whole world was buying into Arianism. But God raised up a man named Athanasius who stood fast against this heresy, gaining the appellation Athanasius contra mundum, or against the world. He stood against the ecclesiastical hierarchy of the time and was instrumental in the Council of Nicaea in 325 which established basic Christological orthodoxy and produced the Nicene Creed recited in churches throughout the world ever since. The orthodox doctrine of Christ is succinctly explained by Charles Hodge in his Systematic Theology:

The Scriptural Facts Concerning Christ
The facts which the Bible teaches concerning the person of Christ are, first, that He was truly man, i.e., He had a perfect or complete human nature. Hence everything that can be predicated of man (that is, of man as man, and not of man as fallen) can be predicated of Christ. Secondly, He was truly God, or had a perfect divine nature. Hence everything that can be predicated of God can be predicated of Christ. Thirdly, He was one person. The same person, self, or Ego, who said, “I thirst,” said, “Before Abrham was, I am.” This is the whole doctrine of the incarnation as it lies in the Scriptures and in the faith of the church.

Everything in Christianity turns on this doctrine, that Jesus was fully God and fully man in one person. Our salvation depends on it.

The Testimony of Scripture is Clear
Despite the church grappling with this issue for hundreds of years, this was the New Testament witness from the beginning. The Apostle John writes (I John 1:4):

Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.

John’s exhortation to “test the spirits” is how we know if a teaching is orthodox or heresy. And it follows if the incarnation is true, if God became a man, then the gospels are factually historical, miracles and all. It’s breathtaking as well when you consider that God paid the penalty, death, for man’s offense against Himself by becoming fully like the one who committed the offense. This fact is why there is no other religion on earth comparable to it, not to mention it claims all the others are lies and it alone is the truth about the nature of reality.

Tomes have been written on Christology, but I will highlight a few passages that declare the unequivocal divinity of Christ.

Paul says in Colossians 1

15 The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Some think “firstborn” is indicating Jesus isn’t eternal like the Father, but all orthodox theologians in the history of the church agree this is in reference to the resurrection, as Paul says in v. 18, that Jesus is “the firstborn from among the dead.”

I Corinthians 1:30  and Jeremiah 23 are a powerful incarnational combination. Paul declares that, “Christ is our righteousness,” and in a Messianic passage, Jeremiah declares that Yahweh, Israel’s covenant making God, is “our righteousness:

“The days are coming,” declares the Lord,
“when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch,
a King who will reign wisely
and do what is just and right in the land.
In his days Judah will be saved
and Israel will live in safety.
This is the name by which he will be called:
The Lord Our Righteous.

Paul is definitively asserting that Jesus of Nazareth is Yahweh, Israel’s covenant making God!

Paul also makes the connection clear in Philippians when he says in Philippians 2,

Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father.

This is a clear reference to Isaiah 45 when Yahweh, Israel’s God, declares,

Before me every knee will bow;
by me every tongue will swear.

Without an anti-supernatural bias, the gospels also clearly portray Jesus of Nazareth as both man and God, which is why Paul can so definitely assert that Jesus is God.

I will end this brief survey with the words every true Christian should proclaim, confessing of Jesus with Doubting Thomas, “My Lord and my God!” In reply Jesus promises: “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

Test the Spirits: It Takes Work
Few people are called to be theologians or pastors, but Christianity is a religion of a book, and thus we are enjoined throughout that book to grow in our knowledge of the faith. Too many Christians think that is for others, intellectual types or pastors and such, but it is for every single Christian. Given we live in the 21st century when knowledge is inexpensive, often free, and easy to get, we have no excuse to not “seek first his kingdom and his righteousness.”

The question for every Christian is whether we see Christianity as a spectator or as a participant, are we on the field, in the battle, or just observing from the cheap seats. Obviously, that’s a rhetorical question, but we might want to make ourselves familiar with the Bereans. Paul and his companions had been in Thessalonica, in modern day Greece, and the Jews in that city were none too happy, so they were kicked out and sent on their way. They travelled to the city of Berea, two days walk, and the Jews there were of a different sort (Acts 17:11):

Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.

Noble, I like that word. It speaks of qualities that are admirable, dignified, regal, and all of us would rather be seen as this than the alternative. And what made the Bereans (the only time they are mentioned in the New Testament) noble is that they were not willing to just take Paul’s word for it. Christianity doesn’t work that way, or shouldn’t. Keep in mind whenever the New Testament speaks of Scripture, graphé or the writings in Greek, they are speaking of the Old Testament. The entirety of New Testament Christianity is built on the foundation of the Old Testament writings, and since all of it is about Jesus, the ultimate biblical hermeneutic, the Bereans felt compelled to see if the writings really did testify that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah.

That too is our charge, except now we have the New Testament and 2000 years of Christian history to look back on to examine and test the spirits, as John exhorts us to do. For those of us who are Protestants, our ultimate authority is not in any church or man, but in Scripture, and it is up to each one of us to examine the Scriptures to see if what we’re being taught is true. We’re not in this alone, however, as if it’s just us and the Bible. We have an advantage over the Bereans in that we have the great creeds of the church, the Apostles, Nicene, and Athanasian Creeds, as well as the Protestant confessions of the 16th and 17th centuries, such as the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), the Belgic Confession (1559), The Canons of Dort (1618-19), and the most famous, the Westminster Standards (1643-1649). The Baptists have the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith. These are all from the Reformed tradition, but modern Evangelicals can espouse most everything in them.

From the very beginning, as John’s exhortation implies, anti-Christs have been a part of the church’s experience. The narrative of the fall in Genesis 3 tells us that our experience against evil in this fallen world is to be a constant feature of existence. The offspring of the serpent is given the ability to strike the heel of the woman’s offspring, which is Christ and his church, but Christ and his church (his body) will in turn be able to strike the offspring of the serpent’s head. The damage we can inflict on our mortal enemy is far worse than he can inflict on us, but it takes diligence, persistence, and dare I say work, to do that.

In our secular age that often looks different than previous eras. The cults of today bear little resemblance to the Jim Jones or David Koresh’s of the world. They look more like Hollywood movie stars or “influencers” on the Internet, business titans, or politicians, all thoroughly secular. Though they are not overtly “religious” they are all religious nonetheless, and the spirit of antichrist is everywhere. So in the face of this vacuous secularism we declare with John that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh from God, and is God, and at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father, now and forever.